RESEARCH ARTICLE
Uncovering Family Experiences with Head Lice: The Difficulties of Eradication
Julie C. Parison*, Richard Speare, Deon V. Canyon
Article Information
Identifiers and Pagination:
Year: 2008Volume: 2
First Page: 9
Last Page: 17
Publisher ID: TODJ-2-9
DOI: 10.2174/1874372200802010009
Article History:
Received Date: 07/01/2008Revision Received Date: 10/01/2008
Acceptance Date: 14/01/2008
Electronic publication date: 24/1/2008
Collection year: 2008
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) are not a significant public health concern but elicit great alarm among parents. The investigators host information websites through which they field several hundred queries annually. This study investigated the experience of those treating head lice infections focusing on control difficulties. A short web-based questionnaire (available August, 2006 and February, 2007) yielded two hundred and ninety-four eligible responses which were analysed using grounded theory analysis processes. The mainly female (91.1%), working (76.9%), respondents from Australia, U.S.A., Canada and UK identified constraints for effective treatment that encompass technological, biological and social issues. Product concerns, treating children and blaming others for re-infection were among the main themes. Available treatment technologies are incompatible with the lifestyles of families in developed market economies. The treatment methodology, nit comb and topically applied liquid, is several thousand years old. Future research and development efforts need to account for the social constraints experienced by lay consumers.
